Ocata Therapeutics, Inc. OCAT (last ticker on record)

CIK 1140098Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
Restructuring
SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 3; Newest began Sep 2014
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 15; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 11; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Feb 10, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 10, 2014SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
Sep 10, 2014SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
Sep 10, 2014SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
May 5, 2014Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 21, 2014Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 1, 2014A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 10, 2014Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 23, 2013An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
May 30, 2012An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Jun 30, 2008Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 7, 2008Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Mar 27, 2008Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 27, 2008Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 12, 2008Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 29, 2006Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Goodwin Procter	Aug 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	1,221	0.79	0.31	1.17
Sheppard Mullin	Dec 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	392	1.12	0.81	1.22
Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP	Oct 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	1,005	1.27	1.62	1.26
Parsons Behle & Latimer	Aug 2005	Named in a filing	66	1.40	1.37	1.31
Pierce Atwood	Jul 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	32	1.23	0.00	0.23
Grushko & Mittman	Nov 2009	Text search only	103	1.19	2.53	1.25
Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps	Nov 2009	Text search only	80	0.85	1.20	0.90
Choate Hall & Stewart	Oct 2007	Text search only	142	0.60	0.75	1.29
Lewis and Roca	Oct 2007	Text search only	46	1.25	1.60	1.33
Feldman Weinstein	Apr 2007	Text search only	278	0.92	1.17	1.20
Heller Ehrman	Oct 2005	Text search only	256	1.00	0.76	0.96
Morrison & Foerster	Oct 2005	Text search only	825	1.17	0.55	1.15
Pillsbury Winthrop	Oct 2005	Text search only	516	1.13	0.82	1.27
Shaw Pittman	Oct 2005	Text search only	149	0.98	0.53	1.08
VENTURE LAW GROUP	Oct 2005	Text search only	127	1.32	1.04	1.23

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Andrew H. GoodmanGoodwin Procter	Nov 2015	Named in a filing	22	1.33	0.00	0.31
James A. MatareseGoodwin Procter	Nov 2015	Named in a filing	26	0.78	0.00	0.00
Joseph C. Theis Jr.Goodwin Procter	Aug 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	31	1.01	0.00	1.01
Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter	Aug 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	109	0.38	0.00	1.03
William D. CollinsGoodwin Procter	Aug 2013	Named in SEC correspondence	24	1.38	0.00	1.12
Jeff CahlonSichenzia Ross Ference LLP	Oct 2012	Named in SEC correspondence	65	1.30	1.41	1.24
Michael FerenceSichenzia Ross Ference LLP	Sep 2012	Named in a filing	44	1.75	1.68	1.44
David B. MannoSichenzia Ross Ference LLP	Oct 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	73	1.20	0.94	1.62
Thomas A. RoseSichenzia Ross Ference LLP	Oct 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	107	1.52	1.67	1.31
William B. Asher Jr.Choate Hall & Stewart	Oct 2007	Text search only	13	0.55	0.00	0.47
Leonard W. BurninghamBrunson Chandler & Jones, PLLC	May 2001	Text search only	36	1.41	1.54	1.62