ELEKTRYON
CIK 1139184Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaye Scholer | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
| Mayer Brown | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Proskauer Rose | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan TalkingtonOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Allan R. WilliamsProskauer RoseFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.68× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- John R. SaganMayer BrownFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 6.60× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Lynn Toby FisherKaye ScholerFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 3.22× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan TalkingtonOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 17 | 0.54 | 1.10 | 0.00 |
| Allan R. WilliamsProskauer Rose | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 4.68 | 0.96 |
| John R. SaganMayer Brown | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 5 | 1.14 | 6.60 | 0.00 |
| Lynn Toby FisherKaye Scholer | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 8 | 1.71 | 3.22 | 1.88 |