LEAPFROG ENTERPRISES INC LF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1138951Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Oct 2003 to Jan 2016
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Townsend and Townsend and CrewFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Buchalter Nemer a professional corporationFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison & Foerster | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Cooley LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Townsend and Townsend and Crew | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 8 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Buchalter Nemer a professional corporation | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 17 | 0.40 | 1.18 | 1.37 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John W. CampbellMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.53×
- Kenneth L. GuernseyCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John W. CampbellMorrison & Foerster | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 2.53 |
| Kenneth L. GuernseyCooley LLP | Apr 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 1.38 |