CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 15 INC
CIK 1138301Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Reed SmithFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Jan 2003 · Text search only · 197 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.10× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- ROSENMAN & COLIN LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTEREDFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- WOLFF & SAMSONFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- White & CaseFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reed Smith | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Paul Hastings | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Jan 2003 | Text search only | 197 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 0.61 |
| ROSENMAN & COLIN LLP | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 40 | 0.82 | 2.29 | 1.80 |
| SWIDLER & BERLIN, CHARTERED | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 78 | 0.98 | 1.75 | 1.36 |
| WOLFF & SAMSON | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 16 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| White & Case | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael B. PollackReed SmithFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- MICHAEL B. POLLACK UIREReed SmithFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael B. PollackReed Smith | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 7 | 3.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| MICHAEL B. POLLACK UIREReed Smith | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 4.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 |