Seagate Technology Holdings plc STX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1137789Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 19
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arthur CoxFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2025 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Dec 2002 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Finn Dixon & HerlingFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 350 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur Cox | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 92 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.91 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Maples and Calder | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2025 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Piper Rudnick | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Dec 2002 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Finn Dixon & Herling | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 28 | 1.29 | 0.76 | 2.33 |
| Herbert Smith | May 2002 | Text search only | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 350 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 1.52 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
| Willkie Farr | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2026 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Lisa L. StimmellWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Louis LehotCooley LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.94×
- Gregory M. KingSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen W. FacklerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.64×
- William H. Hinman Jr.Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- John L. RobinsonWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2025 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Matthew W. SonsiniCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Kris F. HeinzelmanCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 65 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Chris F. FennellWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Jay L. SwansonDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John T. SheridanWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Matthew G. HurdSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael A. SchwartzWillkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul J. ShimCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- William E. CurbowSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven B. StokdykLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2026 | Named in a filing | 62 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Lisa L. StimmellWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 1.72 |
| Louis LehotCooley LLP | May 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.94 |
| Gregory M. KingSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stephen W. FacklerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 2.64 |
| William H. Hinman Jr.Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| John L. RobinsonWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2025 | Text search only | 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Matthew W. SonsiniCooley LLP | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 24 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Kris F. HeinzelmanCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2002 | Text search only | 65 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Chris F. FennellWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 27 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Jay L. SwansonDorsey & Whitney LLP | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John T. SheridanWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 37 | 1.51 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Matthew G. HurdSullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 19 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael A. SchwartzWillkie Farr | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 24 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul J. ShimCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 45 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| William E. CurbowSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 23 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 2.20 |