LUMERA CORP LMRA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1137399Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- HART & HARTFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 2.20× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| HART & HART | May 2004 | Text search only | 50 | 1.47 | 2.20 | 1.27 |
| Perkins Coie | May 2004 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher J. AustinOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.54×
- Mary E. WeberRopes & GrayFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- David F. McSheaPerkins CoieFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Lance W. BassPerkins CoieFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher J. AustinOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 2.54 |
| Mary E. WeberRopes & Gray | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| David F. McSheaPerkins Coie | May 2004 | Text search only | 16 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Lance W. BassPerkins Coie | May 2004 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |