EPM Live, Inc. HIPP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1137204Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jan 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Shulman Rogers, P.A.First linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.71× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Thomas P. McNamaraFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gallagher & KennedyFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perkins Coie | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Shulman Rogers, P.A. | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 25 | 2.71 | 1.26 | 1.16 |
| Quarles & Brady | Feb 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Thomas P. McNamara | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.91 | 1.07 | 0.00 |
| Gallagher & Kennedy | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 32 | 0.44 | 0.98 | 1.05 |
| Goodwin Procter | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faith M. WilsonPerkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Kevin FriedmannRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
- Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Debbie A. KlisRimon P.C.First linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Scott D. MuselesShulman Rogers, P.A.First linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Chad J. WienerQuarles & BradyFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.56× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Steven P. EmerickQuarles & BradyFirst linked Feb 2009 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Thomas P. McNamaraThomas P. McNamaraFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.78× · Went dark 2.51× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faith M. WilsonPerkins Coie | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.47 | 1.43 | 1.93 |
| Kevin FriedmannRichardson & Patel LLP | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.80 | 1.73 | 2.22 |
| Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 1.87 | 1.30 | 1.41 |
| Debbie A. KlisRimon P.C. | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Scott D. MuselesShulman Rogers, P.A. | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 1.72 |
| Chad J. WienerQuarles & Brady | Mar 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.56 | 1.03 | 1.07 |
| Steven P. EmerickQuarles & Brady | Feb 2009 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 1.69 |
| Thomas P. McNamaraThomas P. McNamara | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 9 | 3.78 | 2.51 | 0.00 |