POWER SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC. PSIX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1137091Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- May 2014 to Aug 2022
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2018 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Woodburn and WedgeFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- M2 Law Professional CorporationFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 1.21× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Dec 2018 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Schiff Hardin | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| Woodburn and Wedge | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 62 | 1.51 | 1.15 | 1.12 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| M2 Law Professional Corporation | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.48 | 1.21 | 1.46 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael L. ZupponePaul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2018 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- David McCarthySchiff HardinFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- John P. FowlerWoodburn and WedgeFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Mark D. WoodKatten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.79×
- Joseph I. EmasJoseph I. Emas Attorney at LawFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.27× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Michael J. MuellerleileM2 Law Professional CorporationFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael L. ZupponePaul Hastings | Dec 2018 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| David McCarthySchiff Hardin | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| John P. FowlerWoodburn and Wedge | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 22 | 2.05 | 0.48 | 1.31 |
| Mark D. WoodKatten Muchin Rosenman LLP | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 2.79 |
| Joseph I. EmasJoseph I. Emas Attorney at Law | Sep 2009 | Named in a filing | 107 | 1.38 | 1.27 | 0.83 |
| Michael J. MuellerleileM2 Law Professional Corporation | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.06 | 1.56 | 0.91 |