L & L ENERGY, INC. LLEN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1137083Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Apr 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2010 to Jan 2015
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Glenn & GlennFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.23× · Went dark 3.39× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Glenn & Glenn | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.23 | 3.39 | 0.88 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Bryan Cave | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- D. Roger GlennGlenn & GlennFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 2.85× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Dominador TolentinoRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 2.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D. Roger GlennGlenn & Glenn | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.75 | 2.85 | 1.30 |
| Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 34 | 0.52 | 0.97 | 1.49 |
| Peter HoganRichardson & Patel LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.87 | 1.30 | 1.41 |
| Dominador TolentinoRichardson & Patel LLP | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 10 | 0.82 | 1.45 | 2.38 |