COMMERCIAL CONSOLIDATORS CORP ZCC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1137063Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2002
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Jan 2002 to Sep 2002
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Clark Wilson LLPFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 204 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Krieger & PragerFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 2.16× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Clark Wilson LLP | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 204 | 0.72 | 1.43 | 1.11 |
| Grushko & Mittman | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
| Krieger & Prager | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 38 | 0.90 | 2.16 | 1.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen A. WeissGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2002 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 3.24× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Barbara R. MittmanGrushko & MittmanFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 2.89× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Richard A. WeintraubFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.99× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
- Samuel M. KriegerKrieger & PragerFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen A. WeissGreenberg Traurig | Feb 2002 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.87 | 3.24 | 1.92 |
| Barbara R. MittmanGrushko & Mittman | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 33 | 1.17 | 2.89 | 1.54 |
| Richard A. Weintraub | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 1.99 | 2.11 |
| Samuel M. KriegerKrieger & Prager | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 22 | 1.16 | 2.27 | 1.66 |