IMAGISTICS INTERNATIONAL INC IGI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1137019Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Reed SmithFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Wiggin and DanaFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reed Smith | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Wiggin and Dana | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 56 | 0.82 | 0.30 | 1.37 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Louis L. GoldbergDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Michael GrundeiWiggin and DanaFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Sarah BesharDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Louis GoldbergHerrick, Feinstein LLPFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louis L. GoldbergDavis Polk | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Michael GrundeiWiggin and Dana | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Sarah BesharDavis Polk | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 20 | 1.68 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Louis GoldbergHerrick, Feinstein LLP | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 9 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 2.31 |