NOS4-1, Inc. WLMS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1136294Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jul 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- CONNOR & WINTERSFirst linked Jan 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Conner & WintersFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- White & CaseFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Kane Kessler, P.C.First linked Nov 2019 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, Norris & Rieselbach, P.C.First linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan Cave | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| CONNOR & WINTERS | Jan 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Conner & Winters | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 66 | 1.06 | 0.19 | 1.00 |
| White & Case | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Kane Kessler, P.C. | Nov 2019 | Text search only | 58 | 1.27 | 1.59 | 0.98 |
| Brown Rudnick | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| Paul Hastings | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Winston & Strawn | May 2001 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Reinhart, Boerner, Van Deuren, Norris & Rieselbach, P.C. | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 16 | 1.24 | 1.15 | 1.29 |
| Bingham Dana | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Todd E. MasonThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Derek D. BorkThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mark D. BermanConner & WintersFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Robert J. MelgaardConner & WintersFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Greg S. ScharlauConner & WintersFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
- ROBERT A. CURRYConner & WintersFirst linked May 2004 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Maureen BrundageWhite & CaseFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Frederick TanneKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John M. ReissWhite & CaseFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Oliver C. BrahmstWhite & CaseFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd E. MasonThompson Hine LLP | Jul 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Derek D. BorkThompson Hine LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mark D. BermanConner & Winters | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.76 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Robert J. MelgaardConner & Winters | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Greg S. ScharlauConner & Winters | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 1.88 |
| ROBERT A. CURRYConner & Winters | May 2004 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Maureen BrundageWhite & Case | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Frederick TanneKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 10 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John M. ReissWhite & Case | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 19 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Oliver C. BrahmstWhite & Case | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 2.03 |