SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
CIK 1135644Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
| Davis Polk | May 2007 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mary E. AlcockCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- John PalenbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 6.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John BanesDavis PolkFirst linked May 2007 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary E. AlcockCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 15 | 3.52 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| John PalenbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 6.41 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John BanesDavis Polk | May 2007 | Text search only | 8 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.45 |