JAMDAT MOBILE INC JMDT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1135271Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hampton LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.84× · Went dark 4.25× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Irell & ManellaFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hampton LLP | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.84 | 4.25 | 1.04 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Irell & Manella | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 76 | 1.73 | 1.09 | 1.23 |
| Jones Day | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles S. KaufmanSheppard MullinFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- C. Thomas HopkinsCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Linda Giunta MichaelsonSheppard MullinFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Joseph E. NidaSheppard MullinFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- THEODORE R. MALONEYNida & Maloney, LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- James J. SlabySheppard MullinFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles S. KaufmanSheppard Mullin | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| C. Thomas HopkinsCooley LLP | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Linda Giunta MichaelsonSheppard Mullin | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.69 |
| Joseph E. NidaSheppard Mullin | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 9 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| THEODORE R. MALONEYNida & Maloney, LLP | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 8 | 1.80 | 1.59 | 1.79 |
| James J. SlabySheppard Mullin | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.48 |