CHIPMOS TECHNOLOGIES BERMUDA LTD
CIK 1133478Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Lee and Li Attorneys-at-LawFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| K&L Gates | Jul 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Lee and Li Attorneys-at-Law | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Herbert Smith | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- John D. Young Jr.Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Michael G. DeSombreSullivan & CromwellFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Chun WeiSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William Y. ChuaSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| John D. Young Jr.Sullivan & Cromwell | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Michael G. DeSombreSullivan & Cromwell | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Chun WeiSullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 16 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William Y. ChuaSullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 18 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.67 |