INPHONIC INC INPC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1133324Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Nov 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2004 to Jan 2008
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Hutchison & MasonFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Kelley Drye & WarrenFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 152 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- WolfBlock LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.36× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Piper Rudnick | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.32 |
| Hutchison & Mason | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 9 | 0.89 | 2.39 | 1.89 |
| Kelley Drye & Warren | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 152 | 1.24 | 0.53 | 1.21 |
| Patton Boggs | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Holland & Knight | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.89 |
| Shaw Pittman | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| WolfBlock LLP | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 84 | 0.84 | 1.36 | 1.04 |
| Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 113 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- GREGORY M. GALLODLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Edwin M. Martin Jr.Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Kimberly A. TaylorMorgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.06×
- Nancy A. SpanglerDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2002 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GREGORY M. GALLODLA Piper | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 17 | 0.37 | 1.17 | 1.21 |
| John F. Kennedy | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 190 | 1.52 | 0.60 | 1.17 |
| Edwin M. Martin Jr.Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Kimberly A. TaylorMorgan Lewis | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 7 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 3.06 |
| Nancy A. SpanglerDLA Piper | Nov 2002 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.12 |