BAM ENTERTAINMENT INC BFUN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1132809Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Sep 2003 to Aug 2005
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Taylor WessingFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Taylor Wessing | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 36 | 0.60 | 1.72 | 1.10 |
| Proskauer Rose | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ted WeitzmanK&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Thomas J. PolettiK&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ted WeitzmanK&L Gates | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.04 | 1.69 | 1.08 |
| Thomas J. PolettiK&L Gates | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 71 | 1.51 | 1.24 | 1.75 |