RESOLUTION PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC
CIK 1132423Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- / S / O M ELVENY & M YERSFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- O'Sullivan LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- O'Sullivan Graev & KarabellFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- White & CaseFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| / S / O M ELVENY & M YERS | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 19 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| O'Sullivan LLP | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| O'Sullivan Graev & Karabell | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.19 | 0.58 | 1.70 |
| Holland & Knight | May 2001 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| White & Case | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rosa A. TestaniAkin GumpFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- JOHN J. SUYDAMO'Sullivan Graev & KarabellFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosa A. TestaniAkin Gump | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 29 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| JOHN J. SUYDAMO'Sullivan Graev & Karabell | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 12 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.89 |