ASCENT ENERGY INC
CIK 1132415Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Conner & WintersFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akin Gump | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Jones Walker | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
| Conner & Winters | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 66 | 1.06 | 0.19 | 1.00 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Patton Boggs | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Caroline B. BlitzerVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
- J. Michael ChambersLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 1.96×
- William B. MastersJones WalkerFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.59× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 2.78×
- ROBERT A. CURRYConner & WintersFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline B. BlitzerVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 2.24 |
| J. Michael ChambersLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.64 | 0.20 | 1.96 |
| William B. MastersJones Walker | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 3.59 | 0.71 | 2.78 |
| ROBERT A. CURRYConner & Winters | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 13 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.54 |