INSTINET GROUP INC INGP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1132327Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2002
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Oct 2002 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- H. DAVID HENKENFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.25×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- ROGERS & WELLSFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Warshaw BursteinFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 3.08× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2001 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Mayer Brown | Oct 2002 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Fried Frank | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| H. DAVID HENKEN | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 3.25 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2001 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| ROGERS & WELLS | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 69 | 1.05 | 0.34 | 1.25 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Warshaw Burstein | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 16 | 1.47 | 3.08 | 1.72 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2001 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Sandra L. FlowCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- A. Richard SuskoCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Alan L. BellerCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Gregory E. OstlingWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- William E. CurbowSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2002 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David LopezCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Sandra L. FlowCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 24 | 2.66 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
| A. Richard SuskoCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Alan L. BellerCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.73 | 0.00 | 1.64 |
| Gregory E. OstlingWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 44 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| William E. CurbowSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2002 | Text search only | 23 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 2.20 |