EQUINOX HOLDINGS INC
CIK 1131608Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Spitzer & FeldmanFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2004 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spitzer & Feldman | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Brown Rudnick | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Kaye Scholer | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2004 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven A. SandersBECKMAN, MILLMAN & SANDERS, LLPFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- KEVIN M. DENNISGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul J. ShimCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Stephen C. KovalKaye ScholerFirst linked Jul 2004 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven A. SandersBECKMAN, MILLMAN & SANDERS, LLP | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.37 | 2.18 | 0.00 |
| KEVIN M. DENNISGoodwin Procter | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul J. ShimCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 45 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Stephen C. KovalKaye Scholer | Jul 2004 | Text search only | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |