ZIPCAR INC ZIP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1131457Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Edwards Angell Palmer & DodgeFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 76 | 0.83 | 0.66 | 1.36 |
| Arnold & Porter | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.81 |
| DLA Piper | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.30 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2013 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- John H. ChoryLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Susan L. MazurLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- William J. SchnoorGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2013 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| John H. ChoryLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Susan L. MazurLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Mark V. RoederLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| William J. SchnoorGoodwin Procter | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 23 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.07 |