GSK plc GLAXF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1131399Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 6-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pietrantoni Mendez & AlvarezFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Mar 2003 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez | Dec 2019 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Linklaters LLP | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Sidley Austin | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Brown & Wood | Mar 2003 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Igor RogovoyLinklaters LLPFirst linked Oct 2026 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Adam FleisherCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Sebastian R. SperberCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Leslie N. SilvermanCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2003 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Edward F. PetroskySidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Robert A. RyanSidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Victor I. LewkowCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor RogovoyLinklaters LLP | Oct 2026 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Adam O. EmmerichWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Adam FleisherCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.46 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Sebastian R. SperberCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Leslie N. SilvermanCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2003 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Edward F. PetroskySidley Austin | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 45 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.44 |
| Robert A. RyanSidley Austin | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 24 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Victor I. LewkowCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2005 | Text search only | 31 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.27 |