STANTEC INC STN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1131383Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Norton RoseFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Dentons CanadaFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Fraser Milner CasgrainFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cassels Brock & BlackwellFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norton Rose | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Dentons Canada | Mar 2016 | Named in a filing | 49 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2016 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Fraser Milner Casgrain | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 66 | 0.98 | 0.18 | 0.72 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cassels Brock & Blackwell | May 2005 | Text search only | 102 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher J. CummingsPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 60 | 1.20 | 0.38 | 0.74 |