EXCELLIGENCE LEARNING CORP LRNS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1130950Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 147 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
| Faegre & Benson | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Foley & Lardner | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 147 | 1.13 | 0.16 | 0.99 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brad HelmsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Bradley A. HelmsLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Gordon H. HayesTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.56×
- Paul D. TosettiLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADYHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKINFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Howard Rice NemerovskiHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKINFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad HelmsLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.85 |
| Bradley A. HelmsLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Gordon H. HayesTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 2.56 |
| Paul D. TosettiLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADYHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 24 | 1.23 | 0.79 | 0.66 |
| Howard Rice NemerovskiHOWARD, RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK & RABKIN | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 23 | 1.25 | 0.83 | 0.68 |