HITTITE MICROWAVE CORP HITT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1130866Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Foley HoagFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Choate Hall & StewartFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foley Hoag | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Choate Hall & Stewart | May 2005 | Text search only | 142 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 1.29 |
| Goulston & Storrs | May 2005 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | May 2005 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John D. HancockFoley HoagFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Matthew W. SonsiniCooley LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Robert W. Sweet Jr.Foley HoagFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
- Robert V. JahrlingChoate Hall & StewartFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John D. HancockFoley Hoag | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Matthew W. SonsiniCooley LLP | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Robert W. Sweet Jr.Foley Hoag | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.87 | 1.94 | 2.13 |
| Robert V. JahrlingChoate Hall & Stewart | May 2005 | Text search only | 8 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 0.00 |