NEIGHBORHOOD INTELLIGENCE, INC. NXH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1130713Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Nov 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2014 to Sep 2023
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 19
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Aug 2026 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Jones DayFirst linked Oct 2015 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | Aug 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Bryan Cave | Sep 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Bracewell LLP | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Perkins Coie | Mar 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Duane Morris | Aug 2026 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Jones Day | Oct 2015 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2002 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael P. HeinzSidley AustinFirst linked Aug 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Timothy P. FitzSimonsKing & SpaldingFirst linked Aug 2026 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Zachary A. JuddLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2026 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Benjamin J. CohenLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Robert J. EndicottBryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2019 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Todd M. KayeBryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Edward B. WinslowBenesch Friedlander Coplan & AronoffFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.08×
- Lowell D. NessOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
- Andrew ZuckermanLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Jul 2009 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Thomas W. AdkinsBracewell LLPFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- J. Randall LewisWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.81×
- ROBERT G. O'CONNORWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 3.26× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Robert S. TownsendMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Russell J. WoodMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Robert W. Reeder IIISullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2019 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.70×
- Robert G. O ConnorWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2002 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- David F. McSheaPerkins CoieFirst linked Mar 2002 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael P. HeinzSidley Austin | Aug 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Timothy P. FitzSimonsKing & Spalding | Aug 2026 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Zachary A. JuddLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2026 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Benjamin J. CohenLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Catherine M. ClarkinSullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Robert J. EndicottBryan Cave | Sep 2019 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Todd M. KayeBryan Cave | Sep 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Edward B. WinslowBenesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff | Oct 2015 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 3.08 |
| Lowell D. NessOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.87 | 0.00 | 2.08 |
| Andrew ZuckermanLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Jul 2009 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Thomas W. AdkinsBracewell LLP | Feb 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 1.64 |
| J. Randall LewisWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 2.81 |
| ROBERT G. O'CONNORWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.16 | 3.26 | 1.75 |
| Robert S. TownsendMorrison & Foerster | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 27 | 1.05 | 0.95 | 0.79 |
| Russell J. WoodMorrison & Foerster | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Robert W. Reeder IIISullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2019 | Text search only | 8 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 3.70 |
| Robert G. O ConnorWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2002 | Text search only | 7 | 1.11 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| David F. McSheaPerkins Coie | Mar 2002 | Text search only | 16 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 1.20 |