Traws Pharma, Inc. TRAW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1130598Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2013 to Nov 2023
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Jan 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Jul 2013 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked May 2013 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snell & Wilmer | Jan 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Dechert LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Jul 2013 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Holland & Knight | May 2013 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher L. TinenProcopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLPFirst linked Jan 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 5.75× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Joanne R. SoslowMorgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Scott R. JonesPepper HamiltonFirst linked Jan 2017 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Donald R. ReadlingerPepper HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Jeffrey P. LibsonPepper HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- David S. RosenthalDechert LLPFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher L. TinenProcopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP | Jan 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.32 | 5.75 | 1.17 |
| Joanne R. SoslowMorgan Lewis | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 1.30 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
| Scott R. JonesPepper Hamilton | Jan 2017 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein Sandler | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 69 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.36 |
| Donald R. ReadlingerPepper Hamilton | Oct 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Jeffrey P. LibsonPepper Hamilton | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| David S. RosenthalDechert LLP | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.35 | 0.88 | 1.30 |