ACME PACKET INC APKT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1130258Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.89 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Keith FlaumHogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Julio E. VegaBingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 2.41× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 66 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Mark L. JohnsonK&L GatesFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Stephen H. FabermanBingham DanaFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keith FlaumHogan Lovells US LLP | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Julio E. VegaBingham McCutchen | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.78 | 2.41 | 0.73 |
| Mark G. BordenWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 66 | 1.51 | 0.43 | 1.51 |
| Mark L. JohnsonK&L Gates | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.19 | 1.28 | 1.47 |
| Stephen H. FabermanBingham Dana | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |