CAP ROCK ENERGY CORP RKE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1129162Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C.First linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- Looper Reed & McGrawFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.85×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Fleischman and WalshFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.50× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley, L.L.P.First linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.21× · Went dark 4.30× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Lynch Chappell & AlsupFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C. | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.61 | 1.71 | 1.60 |
| Looper Reed & McGraw | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 10 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.85 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| Fleischman and Walsh | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 12 | 2.50 | 1.31 | 1.22 |
| Heller Ehrman | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley, L.L.P. | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 5 | 4.21 | 4.30 | 0.00 |
| Lynch Chappell & Alsup | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 9 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 1.21 |
| Thompson & Knight | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Michael HainsfurtherMunsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C. | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.13 | 2.41 | 1.15 |