ENERTECK CORP ETCK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1128353Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kaye Cooper Fiore Kay & Rosenberg, LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Danzig Kaye Cooper Fiore & Kay, LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 5.67× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Workland & WitherspoonFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.27× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Gregory B. LipskerFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 4.79× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaye Cooper Fiore Kay & Rosenberg, LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.79 | 1.22 | 0.76 |
| Danzig Kaye Cooper Fiore & Kay, LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.56 | 5.67 | 0.00 |
| Workland & Witherspoon | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 4.27 | 1.10 |
| Gregory B. Lipsker | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 4.79 | 0.51 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David M. KayeKaye Cooper Fiore Kay & Rosenberg, LLPFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 1.70× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gregory B. LipskerWorkland & WitherspoonFirst linked Dec 2002 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.62× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- William L. TaylorDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2004 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David M. KayeKaye Cooper Fiore Kay & Rosenberg, LLP | Sep 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.41 | 1.70 | 0.00 |
| Gregory B. LipskerWorkland & Witherspoon | Dec 2002 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 3.62 | 1.05 |
| William L. TaylorDavis Polk | Jan 2004 | Text search only | 22 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.63 |