INTAC INTERNATIONAL INC INTN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1127439Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- RICE SILBEY REUTHER & SULLIVANFirst linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Cane Clark LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RICE SILBEY REUTHER & SULLIVAN | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Cane Clark LLP | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.25 | 1.17 | 0.97 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lee EdwardsShearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.22× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
- RODNEY L. MOOREVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Michael A. CaneCane Clark LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- David A. WoodFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 4.09×
- Leslie L. KapusianykFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Michael H. TaylorLang Michener LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 68 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 1.14× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lee EdwardsShearman & Sterling | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 2.22 | 0.65 | 2.33 |
| RODNEY L. MOOREVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Michael A. CaneCane Clark LLP | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 57 | 1.14 | 1.18 | 0.76 |
| David A. Wood | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 1.22 | 4.09 |
| Leslie L. Kapusianyk | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 26 | 1.47 | 1.33 | 1.12 |
| Michael H. TaylorLang Michener LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 68 | 1.40 | 1.14 | 0.90 |