General Maritime Subsidiary Corp GMR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1127269Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Apr 2010 to Sep 2011
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Allen & GledhillFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Reeder & SimpsonFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- WongPartnership LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Watson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 2001 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allen & Gledhill | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 64 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Reeder & Simpson | Oct 2005 | Named in a filing | 47 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 1.49 |
| Seward & Kissel | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| WongPartnership LLP | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 17 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 2.10 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Watson Farley & Williams | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 93 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 1.37 |
| Akerman LLP | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Holland & Knight | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| White & Case | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2001 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 2001 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gary J. WolfeSeward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.65×
- Dennis J. ReederReeder & SimpsonFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Thomas E. MolnerKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 2.18× · 95% wipeout 6.30×
- Anthony Tu-SekineSeward & KisselFirst linked Dec 2003 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Robert E. LustrinSeward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 3.08×
- Jeffrey H. CohenSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary J. WolfeSeward & Kissel | Jun 2003 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 2.65 |
| Dennis J. ReederReeder & Simpson | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Thomas E. MolnerKramer Levin Naftalis | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.62 | 2.18 | 6.30 |
| Anthony Tu-SekineSeward & Kissel | Dec 2003 | Text search only | 13 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Robert E. LustrinSeward & Kissel | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 40 | 1.29 | 0.55 | 3.08 |
| Jeffrey H. CohenSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 22 | 1.47 | 0.93 | 0.84 |