SPIRE INC SR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1126956Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stinson LLPFirst linked Feb 2026 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked May 2022 · Named in a filing · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Thompson CoburnFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stinson LLP | Feb 2026 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Bracewell LLP | May 2022 | Named in a filing | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Akin Gump | Aug 2013 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Thompson Coburn | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 85 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.33 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Thomas A. LitzThompson CoburnFirst linked Apr 2002 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Todd W. EcklandPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2002 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas A. LitzThompson Coburn | Apr 2002 | Named in a filing | 19 | 2.70 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Todd W. EcklandPillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2002 | Text search only | 10 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.93 |