PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC PFG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1126328Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead]First linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 197 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.10× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Nov 2007 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Sidley Austin | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| [Thacher Proffitt LLP Letterhead] | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 197 | 0.73 | 0.10 | 0.61 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Nov 2007 | Text search only | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
| Shaw Pittman | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Brown & Wood | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian J. FahrneySidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 2.88× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Jeffrey J. DelaneyPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Perry J. ShwachmanSidley AustinFirst linked Nov 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alexander M. DyeWillkie FarrFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James C. ScovilleDebevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian J. FahrneySidley Austin | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.60 | 2.88 | 1.65 |
| Jeffrey J. DelaneyPillsbury Winthrop | Nov 2003 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Perry J. ShwachmanSidley Austin | Nov 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alexander M. DyeWillkie Farr | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James C. ScovilleDebevoise & Plimpton | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 2.70 |