NTS, INC. NTS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1126216Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Phelps DunbarFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Whiteman Osterman & HannaFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Gersten Savage LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Hamilton Lehrer & DarganFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.44× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Oct 2013 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Watkins Ludlam Winter & StennisFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.31×
- Hamilton & LehrerFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 1.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Williams Law GroupFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.82× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phelps Dunbar | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jul 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Whiteman Osterman & Hanna | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 2.03 |
| Gersten Savage LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 137 | 1.20 | 1.38 | 1.22 |
| Hamilton Lehrer & Dargan | Aug 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 2.44 | 1.66 | 0.98 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Oct 2013 | Text search only | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Watkins Ludlam Winter & Stennis | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 32 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.31 |
| Hamilton & Lehrer | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 20 | 1.87 | 1.75 | 1.35 |
| Williams Law Group | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 76 | 0.77 | 1.82 | 1.30 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kevin J. SullivanWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jaclyn AmselGersten Savage LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.14× · 95% wipeout 3.45×
- Arthur S. MarcusSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Brenda HamiltonHamilton & Associates Law GroupFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 2.36× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Jay M. KaplowitzGersten Savage LLPFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin J. SullivanWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jaclyn AmselGersten Savage LLP | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 1.14 | 3.45 |
| Arthur S. MarcusSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 75 | 1.11 | 0.73 | 1.39 |
| Brenda HamiltonHamilton & Associates Law Group | Feb 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.81 | 2.36 | 1.30 |
| Jay M. KaplowitzGersten Savage LLP | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 43 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 1.00 |