Halo Technology Holdings, Inc. HTHO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1125052Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Aug 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hale Lane Peek Dennison and HowardFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Day Berry & HowardFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Feb 2004 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Bell Boyd & LloydFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLPFirst linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hale Lane Peek Dennison and Howard | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.68 |
| Day Berry & Howard | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 0.81 |
| Heller Ehrman | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Bell Boyd & Lloyd | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 50 | 1.36 | 0.38 | 0.47 |
| Piper Rudnick | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 37 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 1.34 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jon E. GavenmanCooley LLP | Feb 2004 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.41 |