UTi WORLDWIDE INC UTIW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1124827Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jan 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| Paul Hastings | Oct 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James A. McDonaldSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michal BerknerCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- J. MARK POERIO UIREHousley Kantarian & Bronstein, P.C.First linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Stephen D. CookePaul HastingsFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.92× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 3.62×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James A. McDonaldSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2016 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michal BerknerCooley LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| J. MARK POERIO UIREHousley Kantarian & Bronstein, P.C. | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.17 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Stephen D. CookePaul Hastings | Oct 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.92 | 1.64 | 3.62 |