HAIGHTS CROSS COMMUNICATIONS INC
CIK 1124289Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Lewis and RocaFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 1.60× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snell & Wilmer | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Goodwin Procter | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Davis Polk | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Lewis and Roca | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 46 | 1.25 | 1.60 | 1.33 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Philip J. FlinkBrown RudnickFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David P. LewisDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- David F. DietzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2003 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2003 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- George R. Bason Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Roger MeltzerCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip J. FlinkBrown Rudnick | Dec 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David P. LewisDLA Piper | Jun 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| David F. DietzGoodwin Procter | Oct 2003 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2003 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| George R. Bason Jr.Davis Polk | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 37 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Roger MeltzerCahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 18 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.95 |