IMARX THERAPEUTICS INC IMRX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1123695Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Dec 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Fennemore CraigFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- OSBORN MALEDON, P.A.First linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- R. Scott FalkFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stoel Rives | Dec 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| DLA Piper | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Heller Ehrman | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Fennemore Craig | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 99 | 1.13 | 0.59 | 1.10 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 15 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.68 |
| Piper Rudnick | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| R. Scott Falk | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 21 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Mark F. HoffmanDLA PiperFirst linked May 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- JOHN M. STEELDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Christopher S. StachowiakOSBORN MALEDON, P.A.First linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- R. Scott FalkKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Thomas H. CurzonOSBORN MALEDON, P.A.First linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLP | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.09 | 1.37 | 1.07 |
| Mark F. HoffmanDLA Piper | May 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| JOHN M. STEELDLA Piper | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Christopher S. StachowiakOSBORN MALEDON, P.A. | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| R. Scott FalkKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 19 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Thomas H. CurzonOSBORN MALEDON, P.A. | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William M. HartnettCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 1.15 |