SEQUIAM CORP SQUM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1123606Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- CUDD & ASSOCIATESFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.27× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Kurzman Eisenberg Corbin & Lever, LLPFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked May 2004 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| CUDD & ASSOCIATES | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.97 | 2.27 | 0.00 |
| Kurzman Eisenberg Corbin & Lever, LLP | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Dechert LLP | May 2004 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Randolph H. FieldsGreenberg TraurigFirst linked May 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 3.01× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Raymond A. LeeGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2003 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Patricia CuddCUDD & ASSOCIATESFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randolph H. FieldsGreenberg Traurig | May 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.54 | 3.01 | 0.80 |
| Raymond A. LeeGreenberg Traurig | Apr 2003 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| Patricia CuddCUDD & ASSOCIATES | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.98 | 2.28 | 0.00 |