CHIPMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC IMOS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1123134Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Lee and Li Attorneys-at-LawFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.17 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| K&L Gates | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Lee and Li Attorneys-at-Law | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| Cooley LLP | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Herman H. RaspéPatterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Miranda SoDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herman H. RaspéPatterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Miranda SoDavis Polk | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 33 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.68 |