AETNA INC AET (last ticker on record)
CIK 1122304Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Crowell & MoringFirst linked Aug 2015 · Text search only · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.10× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Aug 2015 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Jones DayFirst linked Aug 2015 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2018 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Crowell & Moring | Aug 2015 | Text search only | 59 | 1.69 | 2.10 | 1.49 |
| Fried Frank | Aug 2015 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Jones Day | Aug 2015 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel LitowitzShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.28×
- Robert M. KatzShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
- Shane TintleDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- David L. CaplanDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- H. Oliver SmithDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Richard J. SandlerDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2001 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Darren M. SchweigerDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2015 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 5.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel LitowitzShearman & Sterling | Nov 2018 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 2.28 |
| Robert M. KatzShearman & Sterling | Nov 2018 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
| Shane TintleDavis Polk | Nov 2017 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| David L. CaplanDavis Polk | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| H. Oliver SmithDavis Polk | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Richard J. SandlerDavis Polk | Jan 2001 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Darren M. SchweigerDavis Polk | Aug 2015 | Text search only | 8 | 5.10 | 0.00 | 1.75 |