GLOBAL EARTH ENERGY, INC. GLER (last ticker on record)
CIK 1121901Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC trading suspensionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jones, Haley & Mottern, P.C.First linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 1.91× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Norman T. Reynolds Law FirmFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.87× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C.First linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.91× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Cohne Rappaport & SegalFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones, Haley & Mottern, P.C. | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.82 | 1.91 | 0.79 |
| Norman T. Reynolds Law Firm | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.69 | 2.87 | 1.23 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C. | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 2.91 | 1.08 | 0.96 |
| Cohne Rappaport & Segal | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.29 | 1.03 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richard W. JonesJones, Haley & Mottern, P.C.First linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Norman T. ReynoldsNorman T. Reynolds Law FirmFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.23× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Mark E. LehmanParsons Behle & LatimerFirst linked May 2002 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.17× · Went dark 1.97× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard W. JonesJones, Haley & Mottern, P.C. | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.97 | 1.55 | 0.69 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |
| Norman T. ReynoldsNorman T. Reynolds Law Firm | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 2.23 | 1.29 | 0.88 |
| Mark E. LehmanParsons Behle & Latimer | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.17 | 1.97 | 0.90 |