GARMIN LTD GRMN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1121788Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Stinson Leonard Street LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Stinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan Cave | Jun 2019 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Stinson Leonard Street LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| Stinson Morrison Hecker | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 93 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Maples and Calder | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David OserBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Victoria R. WesterhausStinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John A. GrandaStinson Morrison HeckerFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- John F MarvinSonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Sep 2000 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David OserBaker Botts L.L.P. | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | — | 0.97 |
| Victoria R. WesterhausStinson Morrison Hecker | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John A. GrandaStinson Morrison Hecker | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| John F MarvinSonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Sep 2000 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.59 |