ALAMOSA HOLDINGS INC APCS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1120102Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Thompson Hine LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haynes and Boone | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Paul Hastings | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Armstrong Teasdale | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Thompson & Knight | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Thompson Hine LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 208 | 0.95 | 0.64 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fred B. White IIISkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- David C. InglesSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James R. CarlsonThompson Hine LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.63× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fred B. White IIISkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| David C. InglesSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 14 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James R. CarlsonThompson Hine LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 1.63 | 1.22 |