CHINA ENERGY SAVINGS TECHNOLOGY, INC. CESV (last ticker on record)
CIK 1119601Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC trading suspensionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC trading suspensionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 133 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Michael K. Hair, P.C.First linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 3.50× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robinson & Cole LLP | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 133 | 0.95 | 0.56 | 0.88 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Michael K. Hair, P.C. | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.95 | 3.50 | 2.01 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Elliot H. LutzkerDavidoff Hutcher & Citron LLPFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 1.87× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elliot H. LutzkerDavidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP | Jan 2006 | Named in a filing | 39 | 1.67 | 1.87 | 1.23 |
| Kevin K. LeungRichardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.52 | 0.97 | 1.49 |