Global Realty Development Corp GWSN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1118629Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- RUBIN, BAILIN & ORTOLI LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.79× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
- ROSENMAN & COLIN LLPFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| RUBIN, BAILIN & ORTOLI LLP | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 1.79 | 2.08 |
| ROSENMAN & COLIN LLP | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.82 | 2.29 | 1.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Addison K. AdamsRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Dec 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.85× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.93× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- William S. RosenstadtOrtoli Rosenstadt LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addison K. AdamsRichardson & Patel LLP | Dec 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 3.85 | 2.29 |
| Richard A. FriedmanSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 190 | 1.27 | 1.93 | 1.29 |
| William S. RosenstadtOrtoli Rosenstadt LLP | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.19 | 1.29 | 1.46 |