MODEL N, INC. MODN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1118417Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fenwick & West LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David K. MichaelsFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in a filing · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Amanda RoseFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- James D. EvansFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Jeffrey R. VetterFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 82 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Carol Anne HuffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Gordon K. DavidsonFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David K. MichaelsFenwick & West LLP | Nov 2018 | Named in a filing | 64 | 1.53 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Amanda RoseFenwick & West LLP | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.88 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| James D. EvansFenwick & West LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 0.97 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 1.25 | 0.84 | 1.44 |
| Jeffrey R. VetterFenwick & West LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 82 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Carol Anne HuffKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 43 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Gordon K. DavidsonFenwick & West LLP | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 67 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 1.08 |