BANCPLUS CORP
CIK 1118004Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Phelps DunbarFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Jones WalkerFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covington & Burling | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Phelps Dunbar | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 48 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Bryan Cave | Mar 2020 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Jones Walker | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 1.34 | 0.23 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark A. FullmerPhelps DunbarFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Charlotte MayCovington & BurlingFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Clinton H. SmithJones WalkerFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas D. KimballJones WalkerFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert D. KlinglerBryan CaveFirst linked Mar 2020 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Alexandra C. LayfieldJones WalkerFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael D. WatersBalch & BinghamFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark A. FullmerPhelps Dunbar | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Charlotte MayCovington & Burling | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Clinton H. SmithJones Walker | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas D. KimballJones Walker | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert D. KlinglerBryan Cave | Mar 2020 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Alexandra C. LayfieldJones Walker | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.35 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael D. WatersBalch & Bingham | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.81 |